News: MUGU Caught in 419 scam!

 

419A Nigerian man has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for sending out fraudulent e-mails offering victims big bucks in exchange for moving cash to the United States.

Okpako Mike Diamreyan, 31, was sentenced to 151 months of prison Wednesday by United States District Judge Janet Hall in Bridgeport, Connecticut.

Diamreyan made more than US$1.3 million in a scam that suckered 67 victims between 2004 to 2009, prosecutors said. This type of fraud, called an advance-fee scam, was the number-one type of Internet fraud in 2009, according to the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Last year, advance-fee fraud accounted for nearly 17 percent of the Internet fraud logged by the FBI.

internet

News: A "Lordly" blow to UK internet privacy

Legislation to tackle internet piracy, including bans for illegal file-sharers, has been passed by the Lords.

Internet Piracy: A Long Drawn Battle!

Music download & piracy have been in the sphere for quite some time now.  It causes lots of people to get what they want (easily) – music for free thus making it impossible for music companies to (supposedly) make the amount of cash they want to.

Web filtering - who and what to block?

Kyle Northcutt posted this question on LinkedIn:

Who and what should the web filter block?

Obvious malicious, lewd and illegal content aside.... should mental diversions be limited or blocked from users? Social networking, youtube, gaming, news, etc can be very distracting and hamper production, but when used sparingly can boost morale, enhance creativity and act as an employee perk in the organization.

My question is, which(if any) of these activities should be blocked? Should everyone be affected by this policy or should engineering and executives be excluded? As a bonus, how does your company handle web filtering?

There are many interesting answers to his question - ranging from "Block them all, and only open those you need", to answers like Angelos Karageorgiou, who says:

"I do not think that you productivity will increase by throttling the employee's use of the internet! Slackers will find other ways to slack. To my experience when people spent an inordinate amount of time with diversions, is when they are either unhappy with their work or have lost focus. Both are afflictions caused by management or lack of thereof."

I like Angelos answer because it points to where the challenge really is - the humans. With the technology, we can do everything we can imagine. But humans. Now, that is a totally different manner. It takes a very non-technical manner to deal with those people.

In all my humbleness (right), I post my own answer below (as it is found on LinkedIn).


My LinkedIn answer:

In my experience, blocking access to internet resources soon turn your employers into a negative, less-productive bunch of unhappy sheep (lots of negativity in there, huh?)

Nothing is obvious when it comes to humans, and just blocking whatever one person finds obvious may very well upset someone else. As long as we are using technology to deal with human behaviors, we need to teach the same humans the reasons we choose to use technology instead of juts enlightening them.

There are only a few occasions I suggest using these kinds of controls:

* in controlled / secure environments where you must ensure 100% control of what is entering and leaving the area (then I always advice to set up a set of computers with access - as Internet now is a vital part of our communications)
* in restricted areas like jail and schools where motivation to follow policies are not that evident. But - this is also a very narrow path, as many kids today outsmarts the local IT-resource.
* in short time frames in departments dealing with sensitive information like annual results. Then we may close down all communication within a particular time - but never forget that there are phones, facsimiles and other techs you cannot control (that easy)

I am not a fan of closing down access. I believe that most employees are going to do their job as expected - as long as they get their perceived value in return. And face it - in today's workspace, most people will expect access to the Internet at their discretion.

Now, I am an advocate for employer controlled work environment - ie. the company set's the rules, and when you sign your contract, you agree to follow those very rules. But. As long as we are dealing with humans, we will reach much better results by understanding how psychology and organizations work and function. By using a mixture of positive incentives and negative incentives, and doing this in a clever manner, you will see much better results over time.

Face it, if you force a block, someone will be unhappy. You will start see people trying to work around those barriers. Your management will scream and expect totally different rules. Your day will become a nightmare. And what do you achieve? Less motivated, less productive employees.

I suggest the following approach that has worked a dream in the past:

* set up a QoS on your network, and on your outbound link. Tune down everything you do not like entering (streams, P2P, Skype etc). Set it so low that it is still possible to use it, but not practical anymore.
* Inform your employees regularly about how computers is a time thief (I mean, even for me now - I spend time writing this on the Internet instead of doing any productive work...), and give them tips on how to deal with it. Consider them humans and grown up, and it is amazing what you can get them to accept.
* Set up a network monitoring device, analyzing and capturing data traffic. These devices are able to tune in on, and capture only relevant data - triggered by rules and patterns you can define. Use this to figure out what is really going on, and to find that one or two rouge employees that you know are out there. Now you have evidence you can use to force this person to either follow the rules, or to kick him/her out of the organization.

In the end, you have a very efficient setup that does not intervene with day to day business, that does not make you vulnerable to updates and new "things to block", and that as a bonus makes you the hero of everyone in the organization (except the rouge ones, though...)

I have very good experience with this type of setup. Just keep in mind that you are dealing with humans - so treat them like humans to get the to do what you want!

----

What are your thoughts on webfiltering?

, ,

NetSanity - how can we keep our children safe?

A while back, I helped facilitate a group of parents to develop their knowledge and awareness related to their own and their children's use of the Internet.

And as most parents, I am also interested in this topic. How can I both ensure that my children are getting the most out of their use of the great resource called Internet; while on the other hand keep their hands clean and safe.

The group came up with a list of things to do - and we produced this small flyer. (Norwegian only). You may download the flyer directly.

What are your experiences with such groups? What rules have you made to help your children being safe online? Please share your thoughts!

Weekend Laugh: Map of Internet

This weekends laugh is a map of Internet! Enjoy!

Map of Internet

Image is courtesy of XKCD. Make this weekend special!

Syndicate content

Recent comments